Windows – To Roll Them Down Or Not
People have often asked me, if I
keep my windows rolled down or not, and why I roll them down.
There is a general tendency to
reach for the AC as soon as you start the car, which I have strongly debated
against.
This is my view point after doing
some practical research on my car, stretched over a distance of 12 kms ( office
to home ) and a drive time of 30 to 45 mins with top speed of 45kmph ( city
traffic ) in temperatures of about 30+ ° C
I have done this drive over a
period of 20 days and clocked each reading, both ways, in multiple settings,
i.e. with the AC on, and with windows rolled down, at the same time period of
the journey from Home – to – Work and Back Home.
The Gyan behind the debate and then the tabulated results
Just to Quote, there was this
study done by the Society of Automobile Engineers ( SAE) which found that
driving with the AC on and windows rolled up, actually only reduced the fuel
consumption by 10% while driving with your windows down, decreased the fuel
efficiency by almost 20%.
Hard to know how did they calculate and benchmark the fuel efficiency
in the first place
That’s why I did my own
benchmarking on my Hyundai i20, standard 1400cc Diesel engine.
As a general inference from the
data I collected, I found that driving consistently over speeds of 60 to
70Kmph, then it’s advisable to roll up the windows and turn on the AC.
Reason, the engine is already
powered up, and is capable of running the AC unit, without having to produce
additional power just for the AC compressor. Add to this, at higher speeds, the
drag (wind resistance) would be higher if the windows were rolled down, since
the wind would enter the vehicle rather than flowing outwards. Besides at
higher speeds the higher drag could destabilize
the vehicle compromising safety.
2nd scenario, if you
are cruising in the city, like the testing I did, then it would be advisable to
roll down the windows and let in some air. At these low speeds, the engine
develops lesser power, which isn’t enough to run the compressor. If the AC is
turned on, then there is an additional load on the engine directly resulting in
additional fuel consumption. At these lower speeds, the drag coefficient isn’t
high enough to alter the stability and fuel efficiency of the vehicle
While you guys would still argue
about the best option, the trick is to optimize both situations and alternate
between them.
|
Condition
|
Week
|
Day
|
Kms
|
Drive Time
|
Avg Speed
|
Fuel Consumed
|
Inference
|
|
AC is ON, Windows are Rolled UP
|
1
|
1
|
24
|
0:45:00
|
32
|
14
|
Turned on the Ac as soon
as I started the Car, till I entered the office parking and same while
returning
|
|
2
|
24
|
0:52:00
|
27.69
|
||||
|
3
|
24
|
0:31:00
|
46.45
|
||||
|
4
|
24
|
1:05:00
|
22.15
|
||||
|
5
|
24
|
1:10:00
|
20.57
|
||||
|
Ac = OFF
Windows = Rolled Down |
2
|
6
|
24
|
0:51:00
|
28.24
|
17.5
|
Never turned on the Ac
throughout the drive
|
|
7
|
24
|
0:40:00
|
36
|
||||
|
8
|
24
|
0:50:00
|
28.8
|
||||
|
9
|
24
|
0:48:00
|
30
|
||||
|
10
|
24
|
1:02:00
|
23.23
|
||||
|
Onward: AC = OFF
Return: AC = ON |
3
|
11
|
24
|
0:45:00
|
32
|
16.5
|
Slightly better than the
below figures since the onward drive is slightly uphill, and most a third of
the return journey was cruising downhill
|
|
12
|
24
|
0:55:00
|
26.18
|
||||
|
13
|
24
|
0:50:00
|
28.8
|
||||
|
14
|
24
|
0:52:00
|
27.69
|
||||
|
15
|
24
|
0:44:00
|
32.73
|
||||
|
Onward: AC = ON
Return: AC = OFF |
4
|
16
|
24
|
1:03:00
|
22.86
|
15
|
Very Close to the mileage with AC on, because the Ac was turned on immediately on turning on
the Vehicle and the road was uphill as well.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment